This article was on CNBC recently. What caught my eye was the word "damage" to the CD8+ T-cell response. So I clicked on the report that was referenced, which was an NIH article. (Of course, the NIH would highlight any article that would make getting vaccinated superior to not getting vaccinated. The original report from Cell, is not a clinical paper, but looks at lymphocyte subset responses based on selected antigens they selected as stimuli. Looking at the actual data, there doesn't seem, to my eye, that there is that much difference between those that got vaccinated after infection vs those that didn't. The authors admit in the Limitations section of their paper that the paper only looked at a subset of potential immune responses, and that there could be differences in tissue localization of immune cells, a difference in the kinetics of response, and that the spike antigenicity might be different in the two populations. Using the word "damage" seems inappropriate, as there is really no evidence of injury.
ChatGPT and LLM, which seem to be taking the industry by storm, may allow hidden security risks. Companies should be cautious before jumping on the AI bandwagon just yet before understanding fully what is going on.
So people are giving ChatGPT ears and eyes and real-world interface plug-ins. Wait till they put this in one of those Boston Dynamic dogs.
What don't we just sell law school and medical school diplomas to whomever has the money? No need for standards anymore, right? This is the new DIVERSITY world. Where quality and competence go out the window so as to get the right kind of representation. This isn't the diversity I expected to see.
