Stanley Zhong, the student who was felt to be not good enough for 16 colleges, but was good enough to be a Google engineer,
is suing the colleges. This happened in 2023, the year of the
Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard University and SFFA v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill SCOTUS decision. You gotta laugh at this:
Zhong said the family spent a year in discussions with University of California officials after Stanley's rejections, but nothing changed. He said the turning point came when a UC admissions director emailed him, writing that his allegation of racial discrimination was unfounded because California law bans the practice.
It's like saying we don't need voter ID because illegal immigrants can't vote. Or illegals can't get federal benefits because the law says they can't. Hope Stanley wins.
––– 凄い –––
I read this article
The Real Reason People Aren’t Having Kids, and can't find the answer. OK, so it's not that governments need to support families more. Lack of financial security isn't the entire answer.
“As attractive as economics may be as a solution to the riddle of the growing ambivalence about having children, it is partial at best,” Berg and Wiseman write. Pakaluk observes, “Cash incentives and tax relief won’t persuade people to give up their lives. People will do that for God, for their families, and for their future children.” In other words, no amount of money or social support will inspire people to have children—not unless there is some deeper certainty that doing so makes sense.
So what is the answer? The author thinks it's "loss of meaning".
If falling birth rates can be attributed to a loss of meaning, the question then becomes if there can be any government-based solution to fertility decline. People debating whether to have children seem to be seeking certainty that life is a good thing, that more life would thus be better, and that assistance, if needed, will arrive.
Loss of meaning? What bullshit. Whatever it is, it's global, and someone better figure it out soon.
––– 良くない–––
It used to be that one sure fire way to tell if you were dealing with AI or a human, was to ask it to say the N-word. Like asking a North Korean to openly say a phrase denigrating Dear Leader. But
even ChatGPT can say the N-word, it seems. Oh well. Gotta think of another test.
––– 凄い –––
How Gender Medicine Set Itself Up for Disaster. WPATH and USPATH eventually just became an echo chamber. Towards the end, they excluded any opposing viewpoints, while they kept advocating harmful practices, convincing themselves that they were helping:
The potential for treatment or surgical regret, and the largely unknown rate at which those who undergo gender-transition interventions as minors might experience it, is one of the larger elephants in the pediatric gender medicine exam room. Olson-Kennedy, who is currently serving as USPATH’s president, is notorious among critics of gender medicine for a one-minute clip from an undercover video, shot and published in 2018, in which she is captured responding glibly to the suggestion that minors might regret gender-transition mastectomies. “If you want breasts at a later point in your life,” she quipped, “you can go and get them.”
“It’s been fairly frequent,” she said in 2022, that youth arrived at her practice already taking blockers. This despite the fact that the parents and child often lacked even a basic understanding of the drug’s impacts, risks, and benefits. “It becomes pretty clear that those important discussions either didn’t happen or they didn’t happen in a way that they really stuck,” Berg said. “That really concerns me.”
Holy crap. How was this practice allowed in medicine?
––– 良くない–––
Expensive PSU survey on the homeless finds that while almost all want housing, they want it on their terms. Someone else to pay for it, and to have some financial assistance, too. But there were deal-breakers:
“People with substance use disorder reported many more deal-breakers at a higher rate than people without substance use. Top deal-breakers included drug testing, no guests, room checks, curfews, criminal record exclusions, religious requirements, housing that is difficult to get to, and/or sober/drug-free housing compared to people without substance use,” the report states.
"Overall, people did not report shelters as being especially helpful." Someone tell that to Keith Wilson.
––– 良くない–––