Google is in a bad time right now. Some people are calling for Sundar Pichai to step down or be ousted. Matt Stoller has an interesting article on the dilemma that Google faces now. There are laws that say that the government can tell you what you can't do in the name of Jim Crow laws, but there are those who believe that the government can't tell a private company what to do – something Robert Bork supported. It's easy to support the former when it comes to race, but what about political persuasion? There are folks who think it's fine for Google to take away Tucker Carlson's Gmail account, but not OK if her were a black man. You might say that a black person can't change being black, but Tucker could change his political persuasion, but is that the standard? What about religion? What about sexual orientation? Did Bork have a point after all?
And this person feels that Google is now the modern Ballmer-era Microsoft. No longer nimble and the name we think of for cutting-edge tech. Probably true.
Gavin Newsom is running California into the ground. Eric Adams is running NYC into the ground. Just like CNN's woke newscasters have been running the company into the ground. CNN might undergo needed renovation, but we'll need to see who replaces these guys. Mark Thompson used to be at the NYT, so he's probably not exactly centrist.
So who voted against re-criminalizing fentanyl abuse. These guys. Including, Khanh Pham, not surprisingly. And now we know who the RINOs are. This should have been a no-brainer vote.
I didn't know eating ramen was a guy thing.
Take a look at the freshmen class at Moscow University. Remember when this was us?
Seattleites upset that they can't have nice things.
