Wait a minute. I saw this article (Unconditional cash transfers reduce homelessness) and was intrigued. Was I wrong about Universal Basic Income? Is giving all those homeless people money the right thing to do? Then I read the Methods section of the paper:
Our preregistered screening criteria were: age 19 to 65, homeless for less than 2 y (homelessness defined as the lack of stable housing), Canadian citizen or permanent resident, and nonsevere levels of substance use (DAST-10), alcohol use (AUDIT), and mental health symptoms Colorado Symptom Index (CSI) based on predefined thresholds.
To ensure accurate responses, the screening survey was conducted under a cover story without any mention of the cash transfer.
To mitigate potential risks (e.g., theft, assault) from providing cash transfer to some participants but not others within the same shelter, we randomly assigned each shelter to conditions, such that all participants recruited from a given shelter were in the same condition.
Workshop consisted of a 1-h session every 3 mo for 1 y, where participants were guided to complete self-affirmation, goal-setting, and plan-making exercises to help participants brainstorm strategies to regain stability in their lives. Coaching consisted of three 45-min phone calls per month for 6 mo with a certified coach trained to help participants learn from their own experiences to increase self-efficacy in developing life skills and strategies to achieve their life goals.
Nah, this isn't going to work in real life. It will be money wasted.
––– 良くない –––This is major. SARS-CoV2 spike protein persists for months in those with PASC (Long Covid). With the discovery that whole vax-generating plasmid contaiminants were found in a percentage of vaccines, I strongly suspect that there has been integration of vax plasmid into the genome, causing continuous production of spike protein. The next step is to sequence the isolated spike proteins, to see if there are pseudouridines, present only in the vax. I'm surprised this hasn't been reported yet.
––– 良くない –––Despite the
Farmer's Almanac saying otherwise,
meteoroligists say it's going to be a warm and dry winter this season for much of the northern United States, especially the Pacific NW.
––– 良くない –––How would room-temperature semiconductors change science?––– 凄い –––There are now many datasets that show that more overall deaths occur in the vaxxed. And the vax proponents have been quick to rebuff this saying "Of
course, more deaths occur in vaxxed people because almost everyone
is vaxxed, ya idiot? Geez, math much?" Or something like that.
But supposed getting vaxxed was an independent factor unrelated to
illness. Like whether or not you like jazz.
Then if 40% of the population likes jazz, then you would expect 40%
of all deaths to be in jazz lovers, right?
It's an independent factor, so proportional. Makes sense.
Now, what if 81.5% of the population were vaxxed, yet 96.7% of deaths
were in the vaxxed. What if 18.5% of the population were unvaxxed,
and yet only 3.3% of deaths were in the unvaxxed?
What if 78.7% were 2-vaxxed, yet 96.0% of deaths were in the
2-vaxxed?
What if 65.0% were 3-vaxxed, yet 91.5% of deaths were in the
3-vaxxed?
You would conclude that being vaxxed was somehow a bad thing, right?
So why is the media silent about this? Instead, they're gearing us up for the next vaccine rollout.
––– 良くない –––Another one bites the dust.
––– 良くない –––
