HR is the hazard ratio and the 95% CI is the confidence interval. For myocarditis, and cardiovascular injury, although the hazard ratios are greater than 1.0 in several cases, the confidence interval is wide, and the lower value is less than 1, so the values don't reach statistical significance. However, for arrythmias, the confidence values are nearly all greater than 1. So this deserves follow-up.For myocarditis within 21 days, the adjusted HRs were
0.94 (95% CI: 0.46, 1.94) in NHR,
1.23 (95% CI: 0.13, 11.84) in PHARMO,
3.64 (95% CI: 0.41, 32.53) in EpiChron,
1.05 (95% CI: 0.35, 3.16) in SIDIAP,
2.30 (95% CI: 0.94, 5.66) in CPRD Aurum.
For acute cardiovascular injury the adjusted HRs were
1.38 (95% CI: 0.73, 2.61) in Pedianet,
1.01 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.04) in NHR,
1.38 (95% CI: 1.31, 1.45) in PHARMO,
1.10 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.18) in EpiChron,
0.99 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.03) in SIDIAP,
1.23 (95% CI: 1.18, 1.27) in CPRD Aurum.
For arrhythmia the adjusted HRs were
1.75 (95% CI: 0.88, 3.49) in Pedianet,
1.03 (95% CI: 1, 1.05) in NHR,
1.36 (95% CI: 1.29, 1.44) in PHARMO,
1.12 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.21) in EpiChron,
0.99 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.03) in SIDIAP,
1.27 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.33) in CPRD Aurum.
The source of his frustration: lawmakers’ refusal to join what are known as “interstate licensing compacts.” ...at least 40 states are members of these physicians and nurses compacts. But not Oregon.
Why not? An Oregon Medical Board spokesperson did not directly answer the question. But leadership has been largely critical. “We have been actively engaged in discussions about the compact, and remain concerned for patient safety,” said the board’s executive director, Nicole Krishnaswami. “When a person is licensed through the compact, we are not able to review their criminal history.”
Elevated plasma markers related to neuronal damage and accumulation of phosphorylated tau suggest the presence of ongoing neuropathology in the chronic phase following a single moderate–severe TBI. Plasma biomarkers were associated with measures of microstructural brain disruption on MRI and disordered cognition, further highlighting their utility as potential objective tools to monitor evolving neuropathology post-TBI.
Doctors w/o GPT-4: 73.7%
Doctors with GPT-4: 76.3%
but GPT-4 alone: 92.1%
Not looking good for human doctors. It was a timed test, so maybe some anxiety caused wrong answers, but the control group was allowed all their usual online resources except an LLM. The study says that the doctors were selected from various institutions, but didn't disclose where. First, machine learning models are great when you present them with nicely packaged clinical vignettes. The trick is to tease out the salient elements. But secondly, that doesn't exonerate the human doctors: they deliberately chose to ignore the right diagnosis in favor of something else. This dispels the notion that AI can help clinicians be better doctors.
Thirdly, it foreshadows the future of medicine – that diagnosticians will be replaced by human nurses who are paid to create clinical vignettes for a model to parse. Real geniuses will go into research and industry, and eschew clinical medicine, also largely because it will pay far less than their earning potential.
Yikes.Spruce Pine is one of the only places in the world to mine high-purity quartz.The mineral is an essential ingredient of chips in countless products, including medical devices, solar panels, cellphones and the chips powering the latest tech craze: artificial intelligence. A few weeks of shutdown is not the end of the world, Conway tells Axios. However, longer than that could put the industry into "another crisis." The semiconductor industry would need to find alternatives.