Impressive. Let's see how well it holds up against new cases.they said the test had a sensitivity – or the likelihood of a test being positive if that patient has the condition – of 92%. It had a specificity – the probability the test will rule out negative cases – of 98%.
This also abolished the survival benefit of the checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD-L1, by reducing activated T cell and increasing inflammatory neutrophil numbers.
"My advice to people is to not come closer than 3 meters to a full-size walking robot," Rodney Brooks writes in a technical essay titled "Why Today’s Humanoids Won’t Learn Dexterity" published on his blog last week.He would know.
You mean it lingers? Yikes....but its effects continue, negatively affecting mental activity in future work.
I didn't learn this until too late. It's who you know, not what you know. And as Trump always said, "presentation matters".Managers will claim they are, and we want to believe them. But the reality is that the best don’t always rise. At least not as easily or automatically as we think they should.
Sometimes they do. But often, what gets rewarded isn’t performance but proximity to power, timing, perception, and political usefulness.
"It could even allow same-sex couples to have a genetically related child."
However, the AI model did outperform nurses when it came to identifying the most urgent or life-threatening cases, with both better accuracy and specificity.
Don't tell Oregon nurses.