The Oregonian reflects on why Portland hasn't been able to recover. Why it lags behind other cities.
The whole article has the attitude of
"Gee, we did everything right. What could it be that keeps Portland from recovering?"
This is what they focus on:
A big win would help a lot, he said. Blosser suggested projects like a Major League Baseball stadium, or the Albina Vision Trust’s plan to add housing, cap Interstate 5 near the Rose Quarter and restore a historically Black neighborhood, could demonstrate Portland has shifted out of reverse and into gear.
Portland cafe touts their police bashing ideals and Portland postal workers to rally, march downtown.
Things sure have changed since I grew up, that's for sure.“We’ve spent decades building trust with people, especially with the LGBTQ+ community and immigrants. They’re not comfortable going to someone they don’t trust.”
Well, I'm not sure Canada is the best solution, and people are fleeing there because it's the easiest immediate solution.Joe feels this pessimism, too, and says that the chances that he will return to the UK are slim unless there’s a rebalance between pay, public services and opportunities for growth.
“It’s a big problem for me. The social contract in Canada is strong,” he said. “In the UK, it’s broken.”
Amazing, if confirmed. Paper here.The drug, tested on mice, restored these gamma oscillations, and in turn reconnected neurons to essentially heal the brain damage without arduous physical rehabilitation.
- 59% of the executives say they're "actively looking for a new job with a company that's more innovative with generative AI."
- Less than half (45%) of employees — versus 75% of the C-suite — think their company's AI rollout in the last 12 months has been successful.
- According to a May 2024 study from IBM, nearly two-thirds (64%) of leaders said their organization needs to embrace AI despite the fact that it will change jobs faster than employees can adapt.
- According to a 2024 LinkedIn report, 53% of employees said they hid their AI use from employers for fear that it would make them look replaceable.
- Execs are often so far removed from the actual implementation of AI on a worker level that they don't see or understand this fear and resistance
If the NIH doesn't have to pay as much in indirect costs, it may have more money to allocated to more researchers. It won't help the current grantees, though. Sad to see that Dr. Aaron Grossberg is seeking opportunities elsewhere.Privatized research may be the thing, and industry may indeed be the place where ground-breaking research gets done. Universities have been living off government subsidies for too long.The NIH guidance justified its new 15 percent indirect cost cap by comparing what foundations typically pay for indirect costs: zero. The Gates Foundation has a maximum indirect cost rate of 10 percent. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation pays up to 12 percent. If universities accept zero to 12 percent indirect cost rates from foundations, they should accept a similar rate from the government, argues the NIH.
Colleges reject the relevance of the comparison. They can forgo indirect cost funding from foundations only because the government already provides it, they say. In other words, taxpayers are easy marks when their money is being stewarded by federal bureaucrats. Private funders drive a harder bargain with their resources.
Both open-source and closed-source AI algorithms are trained on immense datasets that include medical textbooks, peer-reviewed research, clinical-decision support tools, and anonymized patient data, such as case studies, test results, scans, and confirmed diagnoses.
And even so, they weren't perfect. So you wouldn't want to trust them completely. The point of this article is that it's the data and the training, not necessarily the size of the architecture.The open-source model exhibited genuine depth: Llama made a correct diagnosis in 70 percent of cases, compared with 64 percent for GPT-4. It also ranked the correct choice as its first suggestion 41 percent of the time, compared with 37 percent for GPT-4. For the subset of 22 newer cases, the open-source model scored even higher, making the right call 73 percent of the time and identifying the final diagnosis as its top suggestion 45 percent of the time.
Oregon lawmakers, ladies and gentlemen.As for Oregon, SB 611 is being put forward as the state is confronting potential federal funding cuts, everybody and their brother seems to want higher spending on schools, affordable housing, transportation and healthcare, Trump tariffs could lead to a trade war that hurts export-heavy Oregon and fears of a national recession are growing.
But what stands out even more in the current debate over the bill? All of its enthusiastic supporters haven’t the faintest idea what it would cost the state.
I see it especially in the caliber of politicians today, compared to what they were like when I was growing up. When I was growing up, we have TV shows where they would invite Milton Friedman to talk. We had Ted Koppel and McNeil-Lehrer news hour. Now we have The View and Joy Reid (well, not anymore).The share of adults in high-income countries who are unable to use mathematical reasoning when evaluating simple statements, or who struggle to integrate multiple bits of information from a piece of text, has climbed to 25 per cent.
Too strong a stoicism, like any individualist philosophy, scales poorly. A philosophy emphasizing only this inner work, though it may personally work well, gives no guidance as soon as you have enough responsibility to participate in society....stoicism is not a sufficient philosophy for a good life, only a survivable one. We must remember what that responsibility, strength, and character are ultimately for.