Raising better children isn't a problem that is solved just by throwing more money at it. The rest of us shouldn't be paying for this either.After four years of payments, children whose parents received $333 a month from the experiment fared no better than similar children without that help, the study found. They were no more likely to develop language skills, avoid behavioral problems or developmental delays, demonstrate executive function or exhibit brain activity associated with cognitive development.
"There is nothing that God hath established in a constant course of nature, and which therefore is done every day, but would seem a Miracle, and exercise our admiration, if it were done but once." -- John Donne, LXXX Sermons
Hawaii faces distinct risks from unregulated AI deployment. Recent analyses indicate that a substantial portion of Hawaii’s professional services jobs could face significant disruption within five to seven years as a consequence of AI. Our isolated geography and limited economic diversification make workforce adaptation particularly challenging.
Our unique cultural knowledge, practices, and language risk misappropriation and misrepresentation by AI systems trained without appropriate permission or context.
Well, Hawaii's not the only place where AI could eliminate jobs. I think that the author is stretching things. But shutting down ChatGPT isn't going to happen. And why just pick on them? How about Google? Anthropic? Hangzhou AI Basic Technology Research? It's like the climate change activists picking on the United States and not China or India.
Dave Barry had a silly encounter with AI inaccuracy.
It was a tough study to do. They tried to estimate lives saved by the vax and looked at data from the whole world, with vaccines of all kinds – mRNA, DNA, with adenoviral vectors and others. As you know, every country reports things their own way. All the authors could say is that estimates of lives saved was, in their calculation, lower than what was promulgated.Estimates in this study are substantially more conservative than previous calculations focusing mostly on the first year of vaccination, but they still clearly demonstrate a major overall benefit from COVID-19 vaccination during the years 2020-2024. Most benefits in lives and life-years saved was secured for a portion of older persons, a minority of the global population.
Interestingly, the vax saved more lives during the Omicron era than before. That seems counter-intuitive to me.
Perhaps the vax impaired the immune systems of the vaxxed so that getting the vax during Omicron made a huge difference.
But prior to Omicron, maybe the immune systems of the vaxxed were still intact enough so that the vax didn't make a difference.
Another conclusion was that the survival benefit was almost all in those 60 or older. So there was really no reason to give it to kids.
"Windsurf and others are really bad examples of founders leaving their teams behind and not even sharing the proceeds with their team," wrote storied investor Vinod Khosla on X. "I definitely would not work with their founders next time."
The resulting $147,187 incentive payment for Rex Kim, the chief investment officer, boosted his total pay to $663,271. Michael Langdon, then the director of private markets investments, received $123,105, lifting his total pay to $533,459.
"Unfortunately, I think 'No bad person should ever benefit from our success' is a pretty difficult principle to run a business on," Amodei wrote in an internal Slack message to staff, obtained by WIRED. "This is a real downside and I'm not thrilled about it."