Is This the New ‘Scariest Chart in the World’? Just coincidence?
“She is not board certified, does not hold an active state medical license, never completed a medical residency and lacks substantial experience in clinical practice, public health, policy and scalable leadership”
The world has become much more reliant on fossil carbon (even as its relative share has declined a bit).We're not ready yet to replace petroleum-based fuels. Vaçlav should stop calling it "fossil fuel" because it's not really that anymore.
During the 1970s many people believed that by the year 2000 all electricity would come not just from fission, but from fast breeder reactors, and soon afterwards came the promises of “soft energy” taking over (Smil, 2000).
“Even if we were to replace just 60 percent of today’s fossil fuel consumption, we should be investing about six times more, or about $13 trillion a year, to reach zero carbon by 2050. Making it $15-17 trillion a year (to account for expected cost over-runs) seems hardly excessive, and it takes us, once again, to a grand total of $400-460 trillion by the year 2050, good confirmation of a previously derived value.
OpenAI's ChatGPT is so popular that almost no one will pay for it. If they charged a small fee at the beginning, people would be fine with it. And it would have helped moderate use. But it's probably too late to demand a fee now. People will protest loudly. And OpenAI is losing a lot of money.
OpenAI is losing about three times more money than it's earning, and 95 percent of those using ChatGPT, which generates roughly 70 percent of the company's recurring revenue, aren't paying a dime to help stem the losses.
“It’s lower than what we hoped."